Whether default of TDS is not allowed in Income Tax Act? Yes, default in TDS can lead to disallowance of expenses and penal consequences. 📌 As per Section 40(a)(ia): “30% of any sum payable to a resident on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or,Read more
Whether default of TDS is not allowed in Income Tax Act?
Yes, default in TDS can lead to disallowance of expenses and penal consequences.
📌 As per Section 40(a)(ia):
“30% of any sum payable to a resident on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction, has not been paid on or before the due date specified… shall not be allowed as deduction in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’.”
In Simple Terms:
If TDS is:
-
Not deducted – 30% of such expense is disallowed.
-
Deducted but not deposited within due date of ITR filing (Sec 139(1)) – 30% is disallowed.
✅ However, if TDS is paid later, the disallowed amount is allowed as deduction in the year of actual payment.
See less
Whether payment made to relatives is disallowed under Income Tax Act? 1. Relevant Provisions in the Income Tax Act: Section 40A(2)(a) – Disallowance of excessive or unreasonable payments to related parties (including relatives) Explanation (b) to Section 40A(2) – Defines "related persons" Section 64Read more
Whether payment made to relatives is disallowed under Income Tax Act?
1. Relevant Provisions in the Income Tax Act:
Section 40A(2)(a) – Disallowance of excessive or unreasonable payments to related parties (including relatives)
Explanation (b) to Section 40A(2) – Defines “related persons”
Section 64 – Clubbing of income if remuneration is paid to spouse without substantial contribution
2. Can Payment to Relatives Be Allowed as Deduction?
Yes, payment to relatives is not automatically disallowed, but subject to scrutiny under Section 40A(2) of the Act.
The law only disallows the portion of payment which is “excessive or unreasonable” having regard to:
Fair Market Value (FMV) of the goods/services
Legitimate needs of the business
Benefit derived by the business
So, if the payment is at arm’s length and justifiable, it is allowed.
3. Bare Act Text: Section 40A(2)(a)
4. Who Are Treated as “Relatives” for This Purpose?
As per Explanation (b) to Section 40A(2):
The term includes (but is not limited to):
Spouse of the individual
Brother or sister of the individual
Brother or sister of the spouse
Any lineal ascendant or descendant of the individual or spouse
Any individual having substantial interest in the business or profession of the assessee
Also includes entities in which such relatives have substantial interest.
5. Example Case:
Let’s say a sole proprietor pays ₹40,000/month salary to his brother for doing clerical work.
If the market salary for such work is ₹20,000/month, then ₹20,000 may be considered excessive.
The Assessing Officer (AO) can disallow ₹20,000/month as unreasonable expenditure under Section 40A(2).
6. What to Keep in Mind:
✅ Maintain proper documentation (appointment letter, qualification proof, work scope)
✅ Justify payment amount based on industry rates or FMV
✅ Avoid cash payments – use banking channels
✅ Make sure the relative actually works for the business
7. Clubbing of Income (Section 64): A Separate Concern
Even if salary paid to a spouse is reasonable, under Section 64(1)(ii):
This is not a disallowance of expense, but clubbing of income for taxation.
✅ Conclusion:
Proper business justification, recordkeeping, and arm’s length payment are essential to ensure deduction is allowed.
See less