Sign Up

Continue with Google
or use


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to ask question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Taxchopal Logo Taxchopal Logo
Sign InSign Up

Taxchopal

Taxchopal Navigation

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Accountancy
  • Finance
  • Corporate Laws
  • Others
  • Users
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Blog

Ramesh Sharma

Enlightened
Ask Ramesh Sharma
0Followers
277Questions
Home/ Ramesh Sharma/Questions
  • About
  • Questions
  • Polls
  • Answers
  • Best Answers
  • Followed Questions
  • Favorite Questions
  • Groups

Taxchopal Latest Questions

Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

From which Financial Year does the CSR expenditure & reporting begin ?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 1:00 pm

    CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) obligations under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 became effective from the financial year 2014-15 (Assessment Year 2015-16). This means that companies meeting the prescribed CSR thresholds were required to start spending on CSR activities and report thesRead more

    CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) obligations under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 became effective from the financial year 2014-15 (Assessment Year 2015-16). This means that companies meeting the prescribed CSR thresholds were required to start spending on CSR activities and report these expenditures in their annual reports beginning with FY 2014-15.

    Key Points:

    • For Existing Companies:
      Companies that were in operation before the implementation of CSR provisions had to start complying from FY 2014-15.

    • For Newly Incorporated Companies:
      A company incorporated after CSR provisions came into force will generally have to start its CSR activities either in the financial year of its incorporation or in the immediately following financial year, as per the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

    • Reporting Requirements:
      CSR details, including expenditure, must be disclosed in the Directors’ Report as part of the Annual Report filed with the Registrar of Companies.


    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 9 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

Whether section 135 is required to be complied by the company as well as its holding or subsidiary company?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 1:01 pm

    Under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions apply on a stand-alone basis to every company incorporated in India that meets the prescribed financial thresholds. This means: Each Company’s Individual Obligation:Whether it’s a holding company, a suRead more

    Under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions apply on a stand-alone basis to every company incorporated in India that meets the prescribed financial thresholds. This means:

    • Each Company’s Individual Obligation:
      Whether it’s a holding company, a subsidiary, or any other corporate entity, the CSR requirements apply individually. Each company must evaluate its own financial criteria (net worth, turnover, or net profit) for CSR eligibility.

    • No Automatic Transfer of CSR Responsibility:
      The CSR mandate does not automatically flow from a holding company to its subsidiaries (or vice versa). If a subsidiary meets the threshold, it must comply with CSR provisions even if the holding company does not—and the reverse is also true.

    • Group Considerations:
      Even if companies are part of the same group, each entity is treated as a separate legal entity. Therefore, the CSR obligation is determined separately for each company.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 11 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

What are the consequences in case a prescribed company does not spend two percent of its average net profits on CSR activities in pursuance of its CSR Policy?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 1:03 pm

    Under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, prescribed companies must spend at least 2% of their average net profits (calculated over the preceding three years) on CSR activities. If a company fails to meet this CSR spending obligation, the following consequences apply: 1. Transfer to Unspent CSRRead more

    Under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, prescribed companies must spend at least 2% of their average net profits (calculated over the preceding three years) on CSR activities. If a company fails to meet this CSR spending obligation, the following consequences apply:

    1. Transfer to Unspent CSR Account

    • Mandatory Transfer:
      The unspent CSR funds must be transferred to a special account called the “Unspent CSR Account” within 30 days from the end of the financial year.
    • Carry Forward:
      The funds in this account can be carried forward and must be spent on CSR activities in subsequent years. They remain blocked until they are utilized for eligible CSR projects.

    2. Disclosure Requirements

    • Annual Reporting:
      Companies are required to disclose details of any unspent CSR funds in their Annual Report and Directors’ Report. This enhances transparency and accountability regarding the CSR activities of the company.

    3. Interest on Unspent Funds

    • Accumulation of Interest:
      If the funds remain unspent for a prolonged period, the company may be required to account for interest on the unspent amount. This serves as a financial deterrent against the continuous accumulation of unutilized CSR funds.

    4. Impact on Corporate Governance

    • Reputational Concerns:
      Persistent failure to spend the mandated CSR amount may attract regulatory scrutiny and adversely affect the company’s reputation.
    • Board Oversight:
      Directors are expected to monitor CSR spending closely. Repeated non-compliance can reflect poorly on the Board’s oversight and corporate governance practices.

    Key Takeaway

    While there is no direct monetary penalty for not spending the required CSR amount, the company is compelled to:

    • Transfer the unspent amount to the Unspent CSR Account,
    • Carry forward and eventually utilize these funds in future CSR activities, and
    • Account for interest if the funds remain unspent over time.
    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 12 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

There are certain corporate groups who run hospitals and educational institutions, will this be considered as CSR?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 1:07 pm

    When it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), it's important to distinguish between core business operations and activities undertaken for social welfare. Here's what you need to know: 1. Core Business vs. CSR Expenditure Core Business Operations:If a corporate group is primarily engaged iRead more

    When it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), it’s important to distinguish between core business operations and activities undertaken for social welfare. Here’s what you need to know:

    1. Core Business vs. CSR Expenditure

    • Core Business Operations:
      If a corporate group is primarily engaged in running hospitals or educational institutions as part of its main business, the related expenditures are treated as regular business expenses.

      • Example:
        A company that operates a chain of hospitals for profit cannot count its operating costs as CSR expenditure because these expenses are integral to its business operations.
    • CSR Activities:
      CSR expenditure is meant for activities that are not part of the regular business but are undertaken for the benefit of society.

      • Example:
        If a company donates funds to support an independent hospital or educational institution, or if it initiates additional projects in these sectors that go beyond its regular operations, such expenditure can qualify as CSR spending.

    2. Alignment with CSR Guidelines

    For any expenditure to be considered CSR:

    • Purpose: It must align with the social welfare objectives specified in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
    • Distinct Activity: The CSR activity should be separate from the company’s routine business operations.
    • Documentation: Proper records and board approvals must be maintained to demonstrate that the spending is directed toward social causes rather than profit-making.

    Conclusion

    • Not Considered CSR:
      Operating hospitals and educational institutions as part of a company’s primary business does not count as CSR expenditure.
    • Potentially Considered CSR:
      If a company supports or donates to such institutions outside of its core operations—focusing on social welfare—it may be able to claim that expenditure as CSR, provided it meets the guidelines under Schedule VII.

    By clearly separating core business activities from purely philanthropic initiatives, companies can ensure they comply with CSR requirements while maximizing their positive impact on society.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 13 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

Whether an activity which a company is required to do as per its statutory obligations under any law, would be termed as CSR activity?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 1:55 pm

    No, activities that a company is required to perform as per its statutory obligations under any law are not considered CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) activities. Here's why: Nature of CSR:CSR involves voluntary actions taken by a company to promote social welfare and contribute to sustainableRead more

    No, activities that a company is required to perform as per its statutory obligations under any law are not considered CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) activities. Here’s why:

    • Nature of CSR:
      CSR involves voluntary actions taken by a company to promote social welfare and contribute to sustainable development, going beyond what is legally required.

    • Statutory Obligations vs. CSR:
      Activities mandated by law (such as environmental compliance, mandatory disclosures, or statutory audits) are compulsory business expenses. These are incurred as part of fulfilling legal requirements and do not fall under CSR, which is aimed at additional social initiatives.

    • Eligible CSR Activities:
      To qualify as CSR, the expenditure must be on activities listed in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013, and should be undertaken voluntarily to benefit society—such as education, health, rural development, and environmental sustainability projects.

    • Key Takeaway:
      Simply put, if an activity is compulsory under any law, it cannot be treated as CSR because it is not a voluntary, extra initiative taken by the company for social good.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 9 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

What are the provisions with respect to signing of financial statements under the Companies Act, 2013?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 2:01 pm

    Under the Companies Act, 2013, the primary responsibility for signing financial statements lies with the Board of Directors. Here’s a comprehensive overview of who is required to sign and the roles of other key officers such as the CFO and Company Secretary: 1. Mandatory Signatures by the Board of DRead more

    Under the Companies Act, 2013, the primary responsibility for signing financial statements lies with the Board of Directors. Here’s a comprehensive overview of who is required to sign and the roles of other key officers such as the CFO and Company Secretary:

    1. Mandatory Signatures by the Board of Directors

    • Directors’ Signatures:

      • Section 129 requires that the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account, and other financial statements be signed on behalf of the Board of Directors.
      • Section 134 mandates that the accompanying Director’s Report is signed by the directors.
      • Depending on the company’s Articles of Association, if there is more than one director, at least two directors may be required to sign; if there is only one director, that director must sign.
    • Auditor’s Signature:

      • The independent auditor must sign the auditor’s report attached to the financial statements.

    2. Role of the CFO

    • Involvement in Preparation:
      • The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) plays a key role in preparing and reviewing the financial statements.
    • Signature Requirement:
      • The Companies Act does not specifically require the CFO to sign the financial statements unless the CFO is also a director or has been specifically designated as a signatory by the Board.

    3. Role of the Company Secretary (CS)

    • Ensuring Compliance:
      • The Company Secretary is crucial in ensuring that all statutory filings and compliance requirements are met, including the preparation and timely filing of the Annual Return and other statutory documents.
    • Signature Requirement:
      • The CS is not mandated by the Act to sign the financial statements unless they are a director or are specifically authorized by the Board.

    4. Digital Signatures and Record-Keeping

    • Use of Digital Signatures:
      • Companies may use digital signatures to sign financial statements, provided they meet the regulatory standards set by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
    • Documentation:
      • All signatures (whether physical or digital) certify that the financial statements represent a true and fair view of the company’s financial position.

    Key Takeaways

    • Directors are Primarily Responsible:
      • The financial statements must be signed by the Board of Directors and the independent auditor.
    • CFO and CS Roles:
      • While the CFO and Company Secretary are critical to the preparation and compliance process, they are not required to sign the financial statements unless they hold a director position or are designated as signatories.
    • Digital Compliance:
      • The use of digital signatures is acceptable as long as they adhere to the prescribed standards.
    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 17 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

Whether all the shares which have been transferred by the company to Investor Education and protection Fund, can be claimed back by the shareholder?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 5:19 pm

    Yes, shareholders can reclaim shares that have been transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF). Typically, if dividends on shares remain unclaimed for seven consecutive years, both the unclaimed dividends and the corresponding shares are transferred to the IEPF. Fortunately, shRead more

    Yes, shareholders can reclaim shares that have been transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF). Typically, if dividends on shares remain unclaimed for seven consecutive years, both the unclaimed dividends and the corresponding shares are transferred to the IEPF. Fortunately, shareholders have the option to claim these shares back.

    How to Reclaim Your Shares:

    1. File an Online Application:

      • Log on to the official IEPF website and fill out Form IEPF-5 to initiate your claim.
    2. Submit the Necessary Documents:

      • After submitting the online form, print the acknowledgment, sign it, and send it along with all required documents (like bank statements, share certificates, etc.) to your company’s Nodal Officer at its registered office.
    3. Verification by the Company:

      • The company will verify your claim and forward a verification report to the IEPF Authority within 15 days of receiving your documents.
    4. Refund Processing:

      • Once verified, the IEPF Authority will process your claim and transfer the reclaimed shares back to you electronically.

    Note:
    If you are a legal heir, successor, nominee, or administrator, you must submit an affidavit in surety along with your claim.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 7 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

Is it mandatory for a company to keep its documents, records, registers, minutes, etc. in electronic form?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 5:26 pm

    Under the Companies Act, 2013 and the subsequent rules framed thereunder, companies are required to maintain certain documents, records, registers, and minutes in electronic form. However, the requirement varies depending on the nature of the document and the applicable provisions. Key Points: StatuRead more

    Under the Companies Act, 2013 and the subsequent rules framed thereunder, companies are required to maintain certain documents, records, registers, and minutes in electronic form. However, the requirement varies depending on the nature of the document and the applicable provisions.

    Key Points:

    • Statutory Registers and Records:
      The Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 and other related guidelines mandate that companies maintain key statutory registers, such as registers of members, directors, and minutes of meetings, in an electronic format or in a manner that can be easily converted to electronic form.

    • Ease of Access and Disclosure:
      Electronic maintenance of records helps ensure quick access, transparency, and timely disclosure of information as required by regulatory authorities, including the Registrar of Companies (RoC).

    • Compliance Requirements:

      • Companies are expected to adopt electronic record-keeping systems that ensure the integrity and confidentiality of data.
      • While physical copies may still be maintained for some documents, they must be readily available for conversion into electronic form upon request by the authorities.

    Conclusion:

    Yes, it is mandatory for companies to maintain their key documents, records, registers, and meeting minutes in electronic form or in a format that can be easily converted to electronic form, in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 and its associated rules. This requirement supports transparency, accessibility, and compliance with statutory obligations.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 5 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

Whether the provisions of quorum under section 103 requiring specified persons to be physically present need to be complied with even in cases where electronic voting is mandated?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 5:28 pm

    Yes, the quorum provisions under Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013 remain in force regardless of whether electronic voting is used. Here's what you need to know: Understanding the Quorum Requirement Section 103 Requirement:This section specifies that a minimum number of directors must be presenRead more

    Yes, the quorum provisions under Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013 remain in force regardless of whether electronic voting is used. Here’s what you need to know:

    Understanding the Quorum Requirement

    • Section 103 Requirement:
      This section specifies that a minimum number of directors must be present at a board meeting for it to be valid. The quorum is typically defined as one‑third of the total number of directors (or two directors, whichever is higher).

    • Electronic Participation:
      The Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 allow directors to participate via video conferencing or other electronic means. Such participation is generally treated as equivalent to physical presence for the purpose of meeting the quorum requirement.

    When Physical Presence May Still Be Necessary

    • Specified Requirements in the Articles:
      If a company’s Articles of Association or Board resolutions specify that certain directors or key personnel must be physically present at meetings, then that requirement must be fulfilled even if electronic voting is used.

    • Critical Decisions:
      In some cases, for highly sensitive or significant decisions, companies may choose to require physical attendance to ensure robust deliberation and participation.

    Key Takeaway

    • General Rule:
      Electronic participation (including electronic voting) satisfies the quorum requirements as long as the minimum number of directors is present—whether physically or via video conferencing.

    • Exceptions:
      If there is a specific provision in the company’s governing documents that mandates physical presence for certain roles or decisions, then those conditions must be met.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 18 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Ramesh Sharma
Ramesh SharmaEnlightened
Asked: March 29, 2022In: Corporate Laws

Whether concept of proxy is relevant in respect of a general meeting wherein e-voting facility has been provided to the members?

  1. CA Sanjiv Kumar Enlightened Chartered Accountant
    Added an answer on March 20, 2025 at 5:31 pm

    Yes, the concept of proxy remains relevant even when an electronic voting (e-voting) facility is available at a general meeting. Why Proxy Still Matters: Statutory Right:The right to appoint a proxy is a statutory provision under the Companies Act, 2013. It allows shareholders who cannot attend theRead more

    Yes, the concept of proxy remains relevant even when an electronic voting (e-voting) facility is available at a general meeting.

    Why Proxy Still Matters:

    • Statutory Right:
      The right to appoint a proxy is a statutory provision under the Companies Act, 2013. It allows shareholders who cannot attend the meeting in person or use the e-voting system to delegate their voting rights to another person.

    • E-Voting and Proxy Coexist:
      E-voting is an additional option that enhances convenience and participation. However, not every shareholder may be able or willing to use e-voting. In such cases, appointing a proxy remains an important alternative.

    • Flexibility for Shareholders:
      The availability of both methods gives shareholders flexibility. If a shareholder faces technical difficulties with e-voting or prefers to have someone represent their vote, they can still opt for the traditional proxy mechanism.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 10 Views
  • 0 Votes
Answer
Load More Questions

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 794
  • Answers 503
  • Posts 11
  • Users 158
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Ankit

    Is interest paid on home loan included in the cost ...

    • 3 Answers
  • admin

    What are the different types of accounting?

    • 1 Answer
  • admin

    What income do I have to pay taxes on?

    • 2 Answers
  • CA Manish Kumar Gupta
    CA Manish Kumar Gupta added an answer No, Notarization or Registration of a Will is Not Mandatory… June 20, 2025 at 2:32 pm
  • CA Manish Kumar Gupta
    CA Manish Kumar Gupta added an answer Hi You can mention ancestral property in your Will only… June 20, 2025 at 2:30 pm
  • CA Manish Kumar Gupta
    CA Manish Kumar Gupta added an answer Hi Nomination gives a person the right to receive, but… June 20, 2025 at 2:27 pm

Top Members

CA Sanjiv Kumar

CA Sanjiv Kumar

  • 271 Questions
  • 3k Points
Enlightened
CA Vishnu Ram

CA Vishnu Ram

  • 189 Questions
  • 3k Points
Enlightened
CA Manish Kumar Gupta

CA Manish Kumar Gupta

  • 4 Questions
  • 1k Points
Enlightened

Trending Tags

interest paid on personal loan QRMP Scheme under GST RBI guidelines on current account

Explore

  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Accountancy
  • Finance
  • Corporate Laws
  • Others
  • Users

Footer

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Taxchopal. All Rights Reserved.