Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, bad debts and provisions for doubtful debts are treated differently for deduction purposes. The law allows actual bad debts as a deduction under certain conditions, while provisions for doubtful debts are generally not deductible. 1. Deduction for Bad Debts [Section 3Read more
Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, bad debts and provisions for doubtful debts are treated differently for deduction purposes. The law allows actual bad debts as a deduction under certain conditions, while provisions for doubtful debts are generally not deductible.
1. Deduction for Bad Debts [Section 36(1)(vii)]
A bad debt is a debt that has become irrecoverable and is written off from the books of accounts. The following conditions must be satisfied for claiming a deduction:
✅ The debt must have been included as income in earlier years.
✅ The debt must be related to the business or profession carried on by the taxpayer.
✅ The debt should be actually written off in the books of accounts in the year in which the deduction is claimed.
🔹 Important: Writing off the debt in the books of accounts is mandatory—mere provision for bad debts will not be allowed as a deduction.
2. Deduction for Provision for Doubtful Debts [Section 36(1)(viia)]
Normally, a provision for doubtful debts (i.e., expected bad debts that may occur in the future) is not deductible. However, an exception exists for banks, financial institutions, and NBFCs:
-
Scheduled Banks & Cooperative Banks: Deduction up to 8.5% of total income (before deductions) and 10% of rural advances.
-
NBFCs: Deduction up to 5% of total income on provisions for doubtful debts.
3. When Bad Debt Recovery is Taxable [Section 41(4)]
If a bad debt, which was earlier allowed as a deduction, is subsequently recovered, it must be offered as income in the year of recovery.
4. Key Judicial Decisions & Practical Considerations
-
The Supreme Court (T.R.F. Ltd. case) has ruled that if a bad debt is written off in the books, the deduction cannot be denied merely because the assessee failed to prove irrecoverability.
-
Businesses should document communication with the debtor (reminders, legal notices) to substantiate the claim in case of scrutiny.
Conclusion
-
Bad debts actually written off in the books are allowed as a deduction.
-
Provision for doubtful debts is generally not allowed, except for certain financial institutions.
-
Recovered bad debts must be offered as income in the year of recovery.
For businesses, maintaining proper records and ensuring compliance with Section 36(1)(vii) & (viia) is crucial for claiming these deductions.
See less
Marked-to-market (MTM) losses arise when businesses or traders adjust the value of their assets, liabilities, or financial instruments to reflect fair market value at the end of the financial year. The Income Tax Act, 1961 has specific provisions regarding the deductibility of such losses. 1. ApplicRead more
Marked-to-market (MTM) losses arise when businesses or traders adjust the value of their assets, liabilities, or financial instruments to reflect fair market value at the end of the financial year. The Income Tax Act, 1961 has specific provisions regarding the deductibility of such losses.
1. Applicability of MTM Loss Deduction
MTM losses are generally allowed as a deduction only if they satisfy the following conditions:
The loss is realized or recognized as per accounting standards.
It is a revenue loss and not a capital loss.
The loss is computed following the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) prescribed under the Act.
2. Disallowance Under Section 40A(3) and Section 37(1)
If the MTM loss is notional (i.e., an unrealized loss), it may be disallowed under Section 37(1), as it is not an expense incurred for business.
Losses resulting from non-business transactions or capital assets (such as revaluation of land or investments) are not allowed.
3. ICDS and MTM Loss Deduction
ICDS – I mandates that expected losses should be recognized only if permitted under the Act.
ICDS – VI (Foreign Exchange Gains/Losses) allows MTM losses on monetary items but not on capital account transactions.
ICDS – VIII (Securities) permits deduction of MTM losses only for securities held as stock-in-trade.
4. Loss on Derivative Contracts
Section 43(5) considers derivative trading in recognized stock exchanges as a non-speculative business, allowing deduction for MTM losses.
However, speculative MTM losses in unregulated derivatives may not be deductible.
5. Judicial Precedents
Several courts have allowed MTM losses if they are business expenses, such as for banks, financial institutions, or traders. However, notional losses due to mere valuation adjustments are typically not allowed as deductions.
Conclusion
The deductibility of MTM losses depends on their nature, compliance with ICDS, and whether they are realized or unrealized. To claim deductions, businesses should ensure proper accounting treatment and classify the losses as business expenses rather than capital losses.
See less