Yes, the concept of proxy remains relevant even when an electronic voting (e-voting) facility is available at a general meeting. Why Proxy Still Matters: Statutory Right:The right to appoint a proxy is a statutory provision under the Companies Act, 2013. It allows shareholders who cannot attend theRead more
Yes, the concept of proxy remains relevant even when an electronic voting (e-voting) facility is available at a general meeting.
Why Proxy Still Matters:
-
Statutory Right:
The right to appoint a proxy is a statutory provision under the Companies Act, 2013. It allows shareholders who cannot attend the meeting in person or use the e-voting system to delegate their voting rights to another person. -
E-Voting and Proxy Coexist:
E-voting is an additional option that enhances convenience and participation. However, not every shareholder may be able or willing to use e-voting. In such cases, appointing a proxy remains an important alternative. -
Flexibility for Shareholders:
The availability of both methods gives shareholders flexibility. If a shareholder faces technical difficulties with e-voting or prefers to have someone represent their vote, they can still opt for the traditional proxy mechanism.
Yes, the quorum provisions under Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013 remain in force regardless of whether electronic voting is used. Here's what you need to know: Understanding the Quorum Requirement Section 103 Requirement:This section specifies that a minimum number of directors must be presenRead more
Yes, the quorum provisions under Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013 remain in force regardless of whether electronic voting is used. Here’s what you need to know:
Understanding the Quorum Requirement
Section 103 Requirement:
This section specifies that a minimum number of directors must be present at a board meeting for it to be valid. The quorum is typically defined as one‑third of the total number of directors (or two directors, whichever is higher).
Electronic Participation:
The Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 allow directors to participate via video conferencing or other electronic means. Such participation is generally treated as equivalent to physical presence for the purpose of meeting the quorum requirement.
When Physical Presence May Still Be Necessary
Specified Requirements in the Articles:
If a company’s Articles of Association or Board resolutions specify that certain directors or key personnel must be physically present at meetings, then that requirement must be fulfilled even if electronic voting is used.
Critical Decisions:
In some cases, for highly sensitive or significant decisions, companies may choose to require physical attendance to ensure robust deliberation and participation.
Key Takeaway
General Rule:
Electronic participation (including electronic voting) satisfies the quorum requirements as long as the minimum number of directors is present—whether physically or via video conferencing.
Exceptions:
If there is a specific provision in the company’s governing documents that mandates physical presence for certain roles or decisions, then those conditions must be met.